Posts tagged ‘BIOF’

Returns for sustainable energy have been very negative this year and trailed broader markets.  LED and Lighting has declined 61.7% since 4/1/08, Biofuels declined 74.9% YTD, and Fuel Cells have declined 70.3% YTD.   For complete return information please visit our returns page.   These declines have impacted the indices as described below.

Effective October 20, 2008 the LED and Lighting, Fuel Cell, and Biofuels equal weight indices have been updated.   Due the the significant changes in market values described above, Camino has revised its thresholds for market capitalization for these indices.  Until further notice the minimum market capitalizaiton to be included in an equal weight index is USD 50 million.   With this rule modification the changes to the indices were:

  • FCELL removed Ceramic Fuel Cells LTD (CFU.L) and added SFC Smart Fuel Cell AG (F3C.DE),
  • LIGHT removed Arima Optoelectronics Corporation (6289.TW), and
  • BIOFUEL removed Biopetrol Industries AG (B2I.DE), MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI), Brasil Ecodiesel (ECOD3.SA), Schmack Biogas AG (SB1.DE), and BioFuel Energy Corp. (BIOF) and added Verenium Corporation (VRNM).

Companies were generally removed from the indices due to their market capitlization falling below USD 50 million.

I don’t know whether we are close to the bottom but October has reduced the market value of the sustainable energy sector by about one-third.  

This is somewhat worse than broader markets and sustainable energy has lost ground against the value of Exxon Mobil (XOM).  To gage the scale of the sustainable energy business I frequently stack up the value of the companies in Camino’s database against Exxon Mobil.  As recently as September 24th at the Clean Energy Showcase in Sacramento I was able to report the 363 sustainable energy companies I track represented 67% of the value of Exxon Mobil.  Today it’s down to 50%.  

For investors in this sector who have suffered significant losses this year, the real question is is there hope for better-than-market returns in the coming months and years?  Or should you go back to cash or  to indexing exclusively?   I think the answer is maybe. 

In Solar there are competing forces which can send the industry on two different tragectories.   US presidential candidates are saying they prioritize alternative energy very highly.  But they, and politicians around the world, are going to face serious financial pressures driven by market forces.  Will they maintain subsidy policies for solar in the face of large budget deficits and potentially continued sub $100 oil?   Without the subsidies investors may be faced with a sector growing much slower then in the last few years. 

Renewable Electricity doesn’t rely to as great an extent on subsidies.  But it does rely heavily on continued access to monopoly electric markets, access driven by global warming and security concerns.   I think the good news for investors is governments can continue strong support for Renewable Electricity without having to deal with significant budget problems.  

LED and Lighting is today driven almost entirely by market forces.   While the sector needs continued cost reductions to increase its market share, silicon technology has proven it can follow a cost reduction path as volumes increase.   With technological advances I think there is the possibility of better than market returns here, particularly with the huge declines the sector has already recorded this year.  Since we formed the LED and Lighting index on 4/1 it’s down 59.8%. 

Biofuels will continue to present challenges to investors.  The promise, of course, is Biofuels is one of the strategies available to reduce oil consumption.  But the sector is resource contrained,  needs significant technology advances, has its margins pressured by declines in oil prices, and has had a number of problems with hedging strategies (VSE and BIOF). 

Fuel Cells are still searching for the niches where they can economically complete and start to produce profits.  Investing in public companies that are still in the development stage presents a high level of challenge. 

Two previous oil price shocks spawned alternative energy companies.  Subsequent declines in oil prices pruned the field but did leave behind a viable independent electric producing sector.   This sector has continued to grow, is now armed with dramaticly better wind technology, and doesn’t need to impact national budget deficits.    I expect Renewable Electricity companies to survive this correction and continue to expand their share of the electric generation market.  This should, over time, produce better than market returns.    

Mark doe not have a position in any companies mentioned in this article.

Not all the declines in sustainable stocks are macro-driven.  For the second time in the last month hedging strategies resulted in stunning losses for biofuels companies.  Predictably the loss triggers a precipitous decline in the company’s stock price.   On August 18th we reported on BioFuel Energy’s (BIOF) problems with hedging  caused a 64% decline in the company’s price.

This time, Verasun (VSE) struck.  In an SEC filing related to a stock issuance, the company described its difficulty purchasing corn in a volatile market and the resulting quarterly loss of USD 63 – 103 million.  In the face of this week’s market turmoil, Verasun lost 73% of its value or roughly one-half billion USD of shareholder value.

It’s time biofuels companies become proficient in managing the very basic price risk in their business.   At this point it won’t be a shock to see another huge loss.  Management needs to build investor confidence by demonstrating through convincing communications and risk management policies that they are competent in this important area.   Other industries have had problems with risk management and in some cases, such as the electric sector, have improved their performance.

Author: Mark Henwood

Emerging markets, EAFA, and commodities (DJP) fell while the US marketS&P 500) was flat. 

While Biofuels is the forth largest strategy behind Renewable Electricity, Solar, and LED-Lighting it highlighted a all too familiar risk for energy producers.  Many energy producers seek to reduce their risk associated with volatility in commodity prices by entering into hedging strategies.  The key point of these actives is to reduce risk, not profit from speculative positions.  After all, the largest, professionally managed financial institutions are proof even the pros get burned by speculation and I certainly don’t want any sustainable energy companies I investing in engaging in speculative postions.

Apparently, even engaging in hedging involves a certain amount of skill.  If management doesn’t get it right the hedging strategy can wipe out the value of a company faster than the worst operational decisions.  BioFuel Energy (BIOF) is a case in point.  On Tuesday the company opened at USD 2.60/share.  After reporting at 12:46 pm that it had insufficient current liquidity to cover USD 46 million in hedging losses on corn contracts, roughly equal to its market value, the stock started plunging, 64% to close at USD 0.94/share.  While the stock rebounded some late in the week, shareholders lost 38.5% of their value for the week.  Coming after Aventine’s (AVR) February problems with the not so safe auction rate securities, I hope management of biofuel companies devote enough attention to their financial dealings to avoid crises.

Mark is the founder of Camino Energy, an information provider specializing in globally traded sustainable energy stocks.